Car-Free Living

You are currently browsing the archive for the Car-Free Living category.

From TheCityFix – ahead of Toronto and many other Western cities, it looks like Mumbai is now running a bike share program & car-free day. This from a city legendary for its automobile traffic problems — trucks are only allowed to enter the city at night so as to reduce the nigh-intractable daytime gridlock!

There’s no doubt about it: a bicycling culture is budding in Mumbai. All in the past month, TheCityFix Mumbai reported on the city’s first Car Free Day, which coincided with the city’s first “Cyclothon and a group of long-distance cyclists riding from Bangalore; and the new trend of evening cycling. Now, Mumbai has joined the growing group of cities around the world with bike-sharing systems. Two bicycle-sharing programs have just been launched in the northern part of the peninsula – Cycle Chalao and FreMo. Their stories are very different – the former was started by a group of students, the latter by a former financial CEO – but they’re both after the same goals: fighting climate change, improving mobility and making Mumbai a better place to live. (Link)

I celebrate the signs of a slow global change towards supporting alternate transportation, and, implicitly, questioning the logic of using massive, unwieldy vehicles to transport single occupants in cramped urban environments.

On the other hand, it’s frustrating to see that the cities I frequent are really struggling to get on the right track – Toronto’s proposed Bixi Bike Share program is teetering on the edge

Out here in Sustainable Transportation Land, where emissions are low and community abounds, it’s ads like this that are a dagger in your heart.
For every dollar we spend on eliminating barriers and supporting good choices, some industry can come along and spend 10x more calling on a much more powerful emotions — shame & fear — to win the day. Our work is subtle, complicated and slow; theirs is brutal, dirty and fast.

“Sigh” indeed.

Via Copenhagenize

Apparently there are these things called “shadows” that appear when the “sun” comes out.

If you can, do take advantage of the stunning sunshine and blue sky out today. It’s so refreshing; so good to be squinting towards a searing blue world. Bundled but comfortable; the sun secretly baking dark surfaces. I’ve missed this.

From Copenhagenize,

there are now bicycle lanes that are double as wide, after another lane was reclaimed from motorised traffic. Simply to accomodate the 38,000 cyclists that use the stretch each day. The width of the lanes is now over 5 metres wide.

Here’s the detail. At the beginning the new ‘outside lane’ was referred to as a ‘fast lane’. When the lanes were completed there was no reference to the outside lane. Instead, the pre-existing inside lane was now called the “Conversation Lane”.

Why sell speed when the vast majority of people on bicycles are content to take it easy on their way to work or the cinema or a café? Selling speed isn’t exactly good for traffic safety. Nor does catering to the minority who like to go faster benefit the majority who don’t.

It’s simultaneously cathartic and frustrating to read this blogger’s commentary, mainly because he lives in a city that appears like a transcendent fantasy at the horizon of possibility….and because he writes all the commentary I am too slow to come up with.

I love the conversation lanes. And the green wave. And the foot rests…etc, etc.

Like so many other elements of Copenhagen, it’s reflective of a coherent infrastructure. In Peterborough – indeed, in most North American communities – this is precisely what we’re missing. And precisely what is going to remain a problem for decades to come unless coherence becomes part of policy for all alternative transportation.

We’re always pushing people out of the norms that are so heavily reinforced in culture and media (drive, drive, drive). So it absolutely does not help that, for instance, in Peterborough bike infrastructure consists of

  • Shared use sidewalks (legal in two places, a ticketable offence everywhere else. Huh?!)
  • On street bike paths (some effective, others that spend 80% of their daily existence as legal parking spots for cars. Huh?!)
  • Multi-use trails (upon which pedestrians, bicycles and even vespa-style e-bikes are allowed; with minimal signage and occasionally baffling interactions with traffic — i.e., the trail head at Armour Road & Nassua Mills intersection)
  • Regular on-street riding with other vehicles.

Now, there’s an endless and very touchy debate among planners and cyclists about bike lanes and trails. Without stepping into that, I’d just like to make the point that so long as we are promoting that people take up an activity about which they have no formal training, a vague understanding of the rules governing their behaviour, and that they do so in an incoherent infrastructure that forces them to make decisions that are legal in some areas and illegal in others, cycling is never going to be a viable choice.

If folks go out on a limb to try the alternative transportation options available to them (a choice that, I often wonder, may or may not have anything to do with all the promotion we throw at them), the last thing they need be confronted with is a byzantine and dubious network of poorly maintained routes.

Cyclists get a bad rap by some drivers, but it’s important to keep in mind that they are being forced to navigate an incoherent transportation system that is largely invisible to cars, with rules that very few are familiar with, using a machine that extraordinarily few have ever actually been taught to use!

I’m grateful for the blinding luminescence granted by the white sheet covering the city today. The grey clouds finally exhausted of their precipitation, I feel the sun like a knife intervening against the oppressive sameness of mud, wet and darkness.

The cold crawled right through my wind barriers today. Hands and feet are still warming up from their tingling freeze.

When I came home last night I had to do a bit of clearing up from that very strange weather yesterday. Ferocious wind, blustery snow, total whiteout, sunny & clear.

I was thankful for the car-free household: shoveling means only clearing a 6′ wide section.

Like most, I find myself feeling low sometimes during these grey, muddy days. We’re well dug in to the middle of winter, unpleasantly faced with traversing as much time with this weather remaining as we’ve endured already.

With pithy accuracy, David Attenborough says “If I can bicycle, I bicycle”.

I do the same, and I think that element of activity helps offset some winter blues. It certainly makes my mornings a little more exciting; I love feeling invigorated when I arrive at work.

But at the other end of the “If I can bicycle, I bicycle” spectrum is the less desirable elements of a (ethically, spiritually, politically, personally necessary) choice: it’s 6:45pm, you’re missing a key ingredient for the dinner you’ve started preparing. It’s dark, raining; drivers are in a hurry to get home, you’re in a hurry to get things done. Cycling to the corner store is still a choice – a good choice, at that – but it isn’t necessarily contributing to the “active transportation equals happiness” pitch that we tend to foster.

How about we make a small change to that equation? Active lifestyle equals happiness — or at least can contribute in a meaningful way to reduced stress, a clearer mind, and the ever elusive sense of well-being.

These aren’t just buzzwords. And “these aren’t just buzzwords” isn’t just a buzz phrase. For the past two years, I’ve been experiencing the benefit of taking the ‘active lifestyle’ stuff serious. I go to the YMCA twice a week at lunch for a workout class, and am never happier than on those days. I sleep well, eat well, and feel good. I feel stress fade, and find a sort of clear headedness that I could never produce otherwise. I’ve seen radical changes in my body, energy level and overall fitness. Sometimes I really don’t want to go – I’m feeling well-planted in my chair at work, or just a little lazy/tired/behind in work, or the weather’s nasty outside. But I’ve trained myself – and it’s taken quite a while to get to that point – to always just go. The secret behind active living, active transportation is…you’ve got to actually do it. It’s that simple.

Like I said in an earlier post, it’s not about what shirt/app/tool/gear you need to buy to do something. The hardest thing – and what becomes, eventually, the simplest thing – is simply doing it.

Consuming and the perceived necessity of consumption as a prerequisite for action is the easiest way to avoid actually acting in the world!

Saturday morning market brussel sprouts by bike.

The only concern is making it through doorways.

The wide stalk knocks on jambs, errant sprouts rolls under couches…

Via the Accidental Hermit blog,

It took me a long time to realize that one of the most important aspects of commuting is the desire to have no kind of adventure whatsoever. (Link, link to article)

Now, he lives a fairly oil-independent, off the grid lifestyle, so introducing any obstacles beyond the basic work of living is understandably undesirable. And maybe my life is a little boring, but part of what I enjoy about getting around outside of the car is the excitement of being a part of the world. Maybe our sense of ‘adventure’ is different: I certainly don’t vie for extreme speed, hairpin turns or danger. But I do feel like most trips are wonderful, important and fun. That’s an adventure, right?

Certainly many folks feel like getting out on a bike is adventurous. Can I tell you a secret? In the four or so years I’ve been riding confidently, my sense of danger and adventure has shifted completely. Being on the bike feels at home, relaxing, simple and good. But whenever I drive or, worse, am a passenger in a car, I get really anxious for my safety. The speed which we take for granted (–which I took for granted! I used to commuted on the 401, and have owned two cars!) seems so unbelievably fast, so much metal careening around. Are our bodies really prepared to react at that speed? Highway infrastructure – signs, lane markings, spacing, etc) is all greatly enlarged so as to create the illusion of slower travel.

Anyway, it’s your thought for Tuesday. Have a great day.

There’s a great thread going on at the livejournal bikepirates community about commute length, mostly by bike, but some people using multimodal (bike + public transit). A few folks reported doing 23 or 27 mile (37-43km!) commutes by bike a few days a week. That distance would definitely be beyond my daily comfort range. The average seems to be in the 8-10 mile (12-16km) range, significantly longer than the median 4.2km commute in Peterborough (around 5km nationally).

It’s interesting thinking of the implications of different distances. I can imagine becoming frustrated with a commute of over 20km. This would depend, of course, on the scenery: 20km in traffic, strip malls and industrial landscapes is a miserable experience vs 20km on quiet roads, woody scenery and bike paths/lanes. That being said, on the busy days of Shifting Gears in May, I do well over 60km travelling to different workplaces daily, lugging a trailer with swag behind me! And, with my partner, it isn’t a solid day of bike touring until you’ve logged 120km or more (we once did 175km Peterborough to Toronto, my longest ride, and that was definitely on the upper limit).

How long is your commute? How long is too long? How does distance affect where you live?

This is part of an ongoing series of interviews with interesting folks in Peterborough who get to work without driving alone.

Today, we’re talking to Donald Fraser and his mighty winter boots. Donald is the manager of Air Quality programming at Peterborough Green-Up, the man behind small print writing/consulting, and a pretty swell guy. As far as I can tell, some of his favourite things include Radiohead, homemade hot sauce, and having a beard.

It’s officially winter here in Peterborough. How does the snow affect the way you get to work?

I ride my bike to work throughout the summer and I tend to do so throughout the winter as well.  The joy of taking quiet residential streets and trails to work each day is tempered by the snow and ice that I have to face on these less-travelled routes in winter.  This is why I sometimes find myself putting on the -40 degree rated baffin island boots and hoofing it in.  Sure it takes 25-minutes or so, but if I dress right and throw on the right tunes, it is a warm and wonderful walk. This morning I jacked up some Hidden Cameras on the iPod and zipped up my puffiest jacket. It was time well spent.

What do you say to people who think you’re nuts for biking or walking during the winter?

I’m toasty warm, stress-free, and I’ve saved a mitt-full of cash. What? You pay how much to operate your vehicle each year?  And then you fight through traffic and end up more stressed than you were before you left?  Are you nuts or something?

Why do you normally choose to bike or walk?

The question should be why wouldn’t I choose to bike or walk?  Really.

Regale us with a memorable moment that occurred during a sustainable commute.

I once wrote a song for my wife while walking to work one winter morning. No word of a lie.  The clip clop of my footfalls made for a great rhythm. Next thing I know, I’m humming a tune. By the time I got to the end of my street, I had a vocal hook for the chorus and was starting to think up words.  25 minutes is just the right amount of time to come up with three verses and a chorus. I wrote down the lyrics when got to work and, that evening, picked up my guitar and played it.  It worked out just fine.

What changes in the community, in the way people think, in marketing, etc, would make your transportation choices better?

If only there were a local environmental group that educated people on the joys of active and efficient transportation…  hey, wait!  there is one! And you can call me to get the entire scoop!

Donald can be reached at climate@greenup.on.ca

« Older entries